The need to remember, and to mark, and to ensure longevity of the rememberance, is a pretty common human reaction to tragedy.
And so marking 1,000 days since the disappearance of Madeleine McCann is not surprising in any way. And roping in Simon Armitage to write a poem is just as predictable – the McCanns are exceptionally savvy media operators. They know, or have the money to pay people who know, how to ensure a headline.
But is the 1000th day any worse or better than the 999th, or the 1001st? It’s doubtful. But it’s a nice round number for the papers. It’s an excuse for a story. And no-one would begrudge them the space.
But Armitage himself, what is his motivation? Art can indeed be inspired by something tragic; the Costa Prize was won by Christopher Reid this year, who penned poems in tribute to his late wife.
But to be effective, it has to be personal. It has to show its emotion, engage in the subject. For Armitage to write an affecting poem, that would make a difference, inspire, have an impact, he would need an emotional attachment, a personal touch.
The poem he has come up with is the opposite. It is detached, impersonal, struggling for a sense of direction or purpose. Perhaps he meant it this way, perhaps it is a poem not about Maddie, but her parents, how their lives have been left. It is effective, as that, perhaps.
But you don’t feel pity for the McCanns if this was the intention. It doesn’t give you any feelings for them at all. It is so restrained, so seemingly uninterested, that it doesn’t let the reader in.
And if it is meant to make you feel the loss of Maddie, make you feel sorry for that small girl lost or dead, it doesn’t work either. She has no narrative here, perhaps purposefully. But in not letting her into the poem, the reader can’t get her out of the poem. She is not real, and therefore we can’t be sympathetic.
Aside from that, as a poem ist is very juvenile. The imagery is clumsy and doesn’t gel, it is obvious and stale. It is not gritty realism nor is it metaphoric. It is nothing.
And so as a piece of Art it is completely unsuccessful. And as a rememberance poem it doesn’t do it’s job either – to act as fuel for rememberance, to keep the fire he talks of burning.
In my opinion, this poem has no fuel, it has no impact. And is a well-intentioned failure.
Judge for yourself though:
The Beacon
Dusk, doubt, the growing depth of an evening sky,
dark setting in as it did that night,
the forever vastness of outer space
reflecting the emptiness here inside,
shadowing, colouring, clouding the mind.
But somewhere out there there has to be life,
the distance only a matter of time,
a world like our own, its markings and shades
as uniquely formed as a daughter’s eye,
distinctly flecked, undeniably hers,
looking back this way through the miles and years
to a lantern cupping a golden blaze,
its candle alive with a fierce blonde flame
for the thousandth time, for as long as it takes.